Feeds:
Posts
Comments

California_cows2
photo originally uploaded by mona, eh

How’s this for green energy: The California Public Utilities Commission yesterday approved contracts for two 49.4-megawatt solar power plants that will use biogas made from cow manure as a backup fuel source. The plants will be located on 640 acres of alfalfa farmland in Southern California’s Imperial Valley and will provide electricity to San Diego Gas &
Electric (SRE). The developer is Bethel Energy, which was founded by Len Daniel, a former engineering executive with the storied solar power pioneer Luz. The Israeli company built eight solar power plants in California’s Mojave desert in the 1980s that are still operating and generating some 300 megawatts of power. The Bethel Solar One and Bethel Solar Two plants will use the latest version of the solar thermal technology devised by Luz. That likely means solar troughs (like the ones at Arizona utility APS’s (PNW) Sagauro solar plant pictured at right) that uses the sun to heat an oil or other Sagauro_solar_trough_2
liquid to create steam to drive a electricity-generating turbine. According to California Public Utility Commission documents, bovine biofuel will be used to pre-heat the plant’s equipment. Cow poop, of course, releases the potent greenhouse gas methane, so using bovine biofuel in a solar power station is a one-two punch against global warming. At least two companies have contracts to sell cow power to California utility PG&E (PCG), but this is apparently the first time it will be used to supplement solar energy.

Light_bulb_ocean
photo originally uploaded by welshkaren

Philips (PHG), one of the world’s leading light bulb makers, wants to flip the switch on incandescent lighting – one of its major product lines. Yesterday the company joined a campaign to push for legislation to phase out by 2016 the use of energy-hogging traditional lighting in favor of more planet-friendly compact fluorescent light bulbs and LEDs. Another unlikely bedfellow in the effort to replace century-old lighting technology is utility giant Duke Energy (DUK). The Lighting Efficiency Coalition – an amalgam of several environmental groups and their corporate allies – supports legislation to promote the switch to less energy-intensive lighting through energy consumption standards for lighting, green buying programs for government agencies and financial incentives for consumers. According to the coalition, energy efficient lighting it could save the U.S. $18 billion annually in electricity costs – the equivalent of shutting down 18 coal-fired power plants or eliminating 158 million tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.  Philips, of course, stands to profit if it can dominate the CFL and LED markets. General Electric (GE) also sells CFLs but recently announced it was developing a more energy efficient incandescent bulb.

Picture_1
TechNet, the technology industry’s lobbying arm, released a report today calling for an overhaul of U.S. policy to promote renewable energy and support green tech innovation. Silicon Valley heavyweights like Cisco Systems (CSCO) CEO John Chambers and venture capitalist John Doerr, along with green tech startup execs, are in Washington this afternoon to unveil the policy initiative. "We are at a unique inflection point at which it is within our reach as a nation to make the shift from an economy fueled predominantly by oil to one that relies on a balanced mix of alternative energies and new technologies," the TechNet Green Technologies Task Force states. "Clean energy innovations are positioned to be the next great disruptive technologies with the potential to revolutionize the energy industry, spurring economic growth and creating new industries
and jobs."

Among the policy recommendations:

  • Double federal funding for energy research to $4 billion a year.
  • Restructure tax incentives given to Big Oil and the fossil fuel industry to favor renewable energy and green tech innovation.
  • Create a national renewable energy portfolio standard requiring utilities to source a percentage of their electricity from solar, wind and other green energy generation.
  • Establish a national carbon trading market to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fight global warming.
  • Allow utilities like PG&E (PCG) to recoup their investments in renewable energy generation and transmission.
  • As the largest energy buyer in the country, the federal government should spur green tech innovation through purchases of renewable energy and establish a quota for green energy consumption.
  • Promote national energy efficiency standards.

To show its member companies practice what they preach, the TechNet report cited recent corporate efforts to support renewable energy and cut greenhouse gas emissions. Computer chip equipment maker Applied Materials (AMAT), for instance, has pledged to power 12 percent of its headquarters from solar and wind energy while Google (GOOG) is installing a 1.6 megawatt solar array on its headquarters buildings to supply 30 percent of its electricity. Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) has promised to increase its purchases of renewable energy by 350 percent in 2007 and Yahoo (YHOO) converted its employee shuttles to run on biodiesel.

How green is that Game Boy? Wal-Mart (WMT) wants to know. Beginning next year the retail giant will require its consumer electronics suppliers to fill out a "sustainability scorecard" listing various environmental attributes of their products, including energy efficiency, use of toxic materials and packaging size. The company will use the scorecard to help it choose which Gameboy_1
products appear on its shelves and will also make the information available to Wal-Mart shoppers. "The scorecard encourages improvements that are good for business as well as for the environment, reflecting Wal-Mart’s view that being a profitable and efficient business goes hand-in-hand with being a good steward to the environment," said Wal-Mart executive Ross Farnsworth in a statement. "Many electronics contain hazardous materials and are disposed of improperly. The scorecard issues a better score to those suppliers who build products with fewer hazardous materials and offer electronics recycling opportunities to customers."

That means consumer electronics companies from Sony (SNE) to Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Kodak (EK) will have to disclose how some of their eco-marketing campaigns translate into reality. Assuming consumer electronics companies cooperate – and few can afford not to play ball with Wal-Mart – you’ll be able to see if a Microsoft (MSFT) Walmartlogo_2
Zune is better for the environment than a Creative Zen MP3 player. Alas, just how green the iPod is will remain a mystery as Apple (AAPL) does not sell to shoppers seeking everyday low prices.  Dangling a carrot to consumer electronic companies, Wal-Mart on Monday also announced a design contest to create a green gadget that will rate high on the sustainability scorecard. The winner will be sold in Wal-Mart’s U.S. stores.

Hp_7000Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) today began selling a series of desktop business computers designed to meet strict new federal energy-efficiency standards for PCs that go into effect in July. Called Energy Star 4.0, the standards are the first update to computer energy efficiency requirements since 2000. Hewlett-Packard says its HP Compaq dc5700, dc5750 and dc7700 can be configured to use 52 percent less electricity than standard desktops, saving between $6 and $58 in power costs annually per computer. That means the computers  run cooler and need less air conditioning. Electric utility companies like PG&E (PCG), Xcel Energy (XEL) and Southern California Edison (EIX) have been pushing Dell (DELL), HP and other computer makers to improve the energy efficiency of  PC power supplies to lower the demand on the grid.

Powerlight_1
photo: PowerLight

What do solar panel maker BP Solar (BP), Silicon Valley renewable energy software startup Fat Spaniel, Canadian power inverter maker Xantrex, the Palo Alto Research Center, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District and the Georgia Institute of Technology have in common? They’re members of one of 13 solar energy "teams" that have come together to secure funding from the U.S. Department of Energy to advance solar technology innovation. The BP Solar-led team, for instance, qualified for up to $19.1 million in government grants over three years – provided Congress approves the Bush administration $168 million budget request for the program – to increase the efficiency and cut the price of solar panels to make photovoltaic power competitive with fossil fuel-fired electricity. While such corporate-government-academic collaborations are not uncommon in Europe, Asia and Australia, it’s a bit of a departure in the epicenter of dog-eat-dog capitalism – particularly in a highly competitive market like renewable energy chock full of startups all hoping to be the Google of green tech.

Among the teams selected by the feds for funding: Boeing (BA), whose Spectrolab subsidiary has developed the world’s most efficient solar module, is leading a research effort to make high-efficiency concentrating PV systems. The team, which could get up to $13 million, includes utility Southern California Edison (EIX), PV Powered and the California Institute of Technology. PowerLight, the Berkeley-based PV system installer now owned by SunPower (SPWR), will use its $6 million in government cash to research ways to make improve manufacturing of non-solar cell components with the help of partners like design software company Autodesk (ADSK). SunPower itself will lead a team, which scored nearly $18 million, that includes MIT to find ways to produce cheaper PV cells and systems.

Silicon Valley thin-film solar startups Miasole and Nanosolar each are heading teams to  develop high-volume manufacturing of flexible solar cells and to research technologies to incorporate them into commercial buildings, respectively. Each team qualifies for up to $20 million. Meanwhile, multinational conglomerate General Electric’s (GE) team will use its $18.6 million to work on ways to speed up the adoption of solar systems through a new type of silicon cell.

Bank of America’s (BAC) this week unveiled a ground-breaking $20 billion green lending initiative to finance companies creating low-emissions technology, underwrite loans for green building projects and create a carbon credit trading service for its customers.  
Bank_america_logo_1
Bank of America also is changing its underwriting criteria for commercial loans to favor companies that provide "sustainable products, services and technologies. For consumers, BofA will offer, among other eco-friendly products a "green mortgage" with a reduced interest rate or a rebate if their new house meets energy efficiency standards.

Green Wombat talked yesterday with James Mahoney, BofA’s director of public policy, about why the U.S.’s second largest bank thinks fighting global warming is a huge business opportunity for the banking industry – and whether competitors like Citigroup (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Wachovia (WB), Wells Fargo (WFC) will follow its lead.

Green Wombat: Bank of Amercia is not doing this just because it thinks it is the right thing to do. What is the business rationale behind the initiative?

James Mahoney: This goes beyond philanthropy and actually incorporates environmental considerations into the way we do business. It’s an initiative that cuts across our three major lines of business: Corporate and investment banking, consumer banking, and wealth management.   What we see, with the growing concerns about climate change, is that there is going to be an increased demand for both products and services that produce and use energy more efficiently. As efforts emerge to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, there will be new technologies to both produce and use energy. We see business opportunities arising as a result of climate change. This initiative is intended to support customers that want to take advantage of those opportunities. We definitely see this as a growth area in the years ahead.

Green Wombat: What type of commercial customers will be the biggest beneficiaries of the program?

Mahoney: I think technology companies with innovative products, utilities that are investing in green technology and green energy sources will benefit. I think for that matter, so will coal companies that are looking to introduce new ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the years ahead. We think no matter what kind of business you have there are opportunities to produce and use energy more efficiently. As a bank we’re finding there are multiple opportunities to produce green business opportunities in commercial lending, investment banking, and carbon credit trading as that market develops.

Continue Reading »

Dell_plant_a_tree_for_me
Has the carbon offset craze jumped the shark? Dell (DELL) earlier this year began letting customers pay a small carbon offset fee when they order their computers. The money is used to plant trees, which absorb carbon and thus theoretically cancel out the planet-warming greenhouse gases emitted by the production and use of individual customers’ laptops and desktops. Today Dell expanded its "Plant a Tree for Me" program to all customers – past and present – as well as, well, anyone who wants to go to the computer maker’s site and donate $99 to offset a year’s worth of their carbon emissions. Planting trees, of course, has environmental benefits beyond forests’ role in reducing global warming – though just how effective they are has been in dispute, as have carbon offset programs themselves. And Dell, along with Hewlett Packard (HPQ), certainly has made significant progress in ameliorating the environmental impact of its products through recycling programs. But absolving the sin of one’s personal greenhouse gas emissions via Visa or MasterCard is starting to become the environmental equivalent of slapping a bumper sticker on your car. Sure, it raises awareness and may be doing some real good but it does not require anyone to actually do anything to reduce their own contribution to global warming – like trading in the SUV, replacing light bulbs with CFLs or just saying no to paper and plastic. We’ll know things have really gone too far when you see Apple (AAPL) launch a "Plant a Tree for Steve" campaign.

Mhd_reg_logoIn what could be a big boost for green tech entrepreneurs,
Bank of America (BAC) this morning launched a $20 billion program to fight global warming over the next decade by financing companies creating low-emissions technology, lending money for green building projects and creating the ability for customers to trade carbon credits. The bank will spend $18 billion on commercial green lending and finance while another $2 billion will be spent on consumer programs and efforts to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impact of its own operations. Green Wombat is waiting on a reply from BofA whether it will use its pot of green cash to finance solar power plants, wind farms and other utility-scale renewable energy projects. But the fact that the U.S.’s second-largest bank has decided there is money to be made off green lending is, potentially, a huge boon for startups that have found it tough going obtaining financing for capital-intensive renewable energy technologies. While Silicon Valley venture capitalists have pumped billions into green startups over the past couple years, they traditionally do not finance factories or 250-megawatt solar power plants. The bank’s move also could create opportunities for green companies without access to Sand Hill Road VCs. "Today, we have a tremendous opportunity to support our customer’s efforts to build an environmentally sustainable economy – through innovative home and office construction, new manufacturing technology, changes in transportation, and new ways to supply our energy," said Bank of America CEO Kenneth D. Lewis in a statement.

BofA will change its underwriting criteria for commercial loans to include environmental factors, such as whether a business creates "sustainable products, services and technologies." In other words, a company that makes less carbon-intensive widgets will score higher on a loan application than one whose production process consumes more fossil fuels. If other banks adopt green underwriting, the impact could be significant.

For consumers, Bank of America later this year will offer an "eco-friendly" credit card – a percentage of each purchase will be donated to an environmental organization to invest in greenhouse gas reduction projects. Home buyers can apply for a "green mortgage" with a reduced interest rate or a rebate if their new house meets energy efficiency standards. "Bank of America intends to commit its own capital to promote "green" investment solutions for its clients," the company said, referring to investments that promote reforestation, wildlife management, "responsible development" and carbon sequestration.

Continue Reading »

Las_vegas_biobugphoto: LVRCCC

Las Vegas usually doesn’t make anyone’s list of green cities, what with its sprawling water-sucking desert suburbs and smoke-filled casinos. But it turns out that nobody beats Sin City when it comes to powering its vehicle fleet with alternative energy like biodiesel, natural gas, electricity and hydrogen. Sixty-three percent of Las Vegas’s buses, cars, trucks and other municipal vehicles – 450 in total – use some form of alternative fuels that emit fewer planet-warming greenhouse gases than conventional gasoline or diesel, according to SustainLane, a San Francisco environmental management service. That made Vegas the No. 1 for alternative fuel fleets in SustainLane’s survey of the U.S.’s 50 biggest cities. Next up in the top 10 was Honolulu, with 51 percent of its fleet forsaking Big Oil; Kansas City, Missouri (45 percent), Albuquerque (42 percent), Dallas (39 percent), Denver (31 percent), Phoenix (28 percent), Los Angeles (25 percent), Seattle (25 percent) and Portland, Oregon (25 percent). Conspicuous in their absence from the list were the ecotopias of San Francisco and San Jose.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started