<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Green Wombat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegreenwombat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegreenwombat.com</link>
	<description>environment + technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GE to build U.S.&#8217; largest solar factory, shake up market by Robert C Olson</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/04/06/ge-to-build-u-s-largest-solar-factory-shake-up-market/#comment-4103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert C Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4944#comment-4103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s wonderful about green-tech like solar is that it can be lumped under the kind of innovation that Obama has talked about to re-engage the US economy.  What I&#039;m wondering about GE&#039;s latest push though, is whether this means more jobs for Americans.

So many organizations and industry leaders are promoting the green-economy&#039;s growing numbers that it makes me hesitant.  Here in Southern California, I&#039;m seeing a fair number of people go in and out of business because solar is still pretty expensive and competition is fierce - it&#039;s the Wild West!

Will large corporations like GE help stabilize the market?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wonderful about green-tech like solar is that it can be lumped under the kind of innovation that Obama has talked about to re-engage the US economy.  What I&#8217;m wondering about GE&#8217;s latest push though, is whether this means more jobs for Americans.</p>
<p>So many organizations and industry leaders are promoting the green-economy&#8217;s growing numbers that it makes me hesitant.  Here in Southern California, I&#8217;m seeing a fair number of people go in and out of business because solar is still pretty expensive and competition is fierce &#8211; it&#8217;s the Wild West!</p>
<p>Will large corporations like GE help stabilize the market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GE to build U.S.&#8217; largest solar factory, shake up market by The Cleaning Authority</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/04/06/ge-to-build-u-s-largest-solar-factory-shake-up-market/#comment-4096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cleaning Authority]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4944#comment-4096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are the chances of solar, wind and other alternatives becoming a viable alternative to nuclear?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the chances of solar, wind and other alternatives becoming a viable alternative to nuclear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free ride: Rising oil prices boost electric cars’ affordability by electric bob</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/03/30/free-ride-rising-oil-prices-boost-electric-cars%e2%80%99-affordability/#comment-4095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[electric bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4915#comment-4095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Electric car technologies are ready and waiting for investors

Check company like 3xE ( http://3xe-electric-cars.com ) in Europe.
With few $$ investors could make them global players and let them win leading position on the market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electric car technologies are ready and waiting for investors</p>
<p>Check company like 3xE ( <a href="http://3xe-electric-cars.com" rel="nofollow">http://3xe-electric-cars.com</a> ) in Europe.<br />
With few $$ investors could make them global players and let them win leading position on the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California utilities (just) miss renewable energy deadline by Primm Nevada</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/03/11/california-utilities-just-miss-renewable-energy-deadline/#comment-4040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Primm Nevada]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4850#comment-4040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article.  I wonder if the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.primmnevada.net/ivanpah-dry-lake.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ivanpah Dry Lake&lt;/a&gt; solar farm site will meet the deadline and actually get built.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  I wonder if the <a href="http://www.primmnevada.net/ivanpah-dry-lake.php" rel="nofollow">Ivanpah Dry Lake</a> solar farm site will meet the deadline and actually get built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opposed piston engine tech promises fuel efficiency gains by Manousos Pattakos</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/04/04/opposed-piston-engine-tech-promises-fuel-efficiency-gains/#comment-4039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manousos Pattakos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4929#comment-4039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FEV, OPOC, Achates, Pinnacle (not to mention Navistar and the Asian partners) all in one article!

“The technology is viable,” said Dean Tomazic, vice president of FEV.

If the technology as we know it since well before WWII is viable, why not slant it a little and do more?

At http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonOPRE.htm is a 2 crankshaft opposed piston engine (like Achates and Pinnacle).
At http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonPatOP.htm is a single crankshaft opposed piston engine (like EcoMotor’s OPOC).
At http://www.pattakon.com/pre/PRE16.exe is a range-extender (like FEV’s Wankel range-extender).
At http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonFly.htm is a promising unconventional application.

Dr. Tomazic of FEV also said: “The industry is really competitive, and everyone is looking for good technology that they can get cheaply and meet customer demands.”

Will the author Todd Woody ask the vice president of FEV to comment on these different, but still opposed-piston engines?

Thanks
Manousos Pattakos]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FEV, OPOC, Achates, Pinnacle (not to mention Navistar and the Asian partners) all in one article!</p>
<p>“The technology is viable,” said Dean Tomazic, vice president of FEV.</p>
<p>If the technology as we know it since well before WWII is viable, why not slant it a little and do more?</p>
<p>At <a href="http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonOPRE.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonOPRE.htm</a> is a 2 crankshaft opposed piston engine (like Achates and Pinnacle).<br />
At <a href="http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonPatOP.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonPatOP.htm</a> is a single crankshaft opposed piston engine (like EcoMotor’s OPOC).<br />
At <a href="http://www.pattakon.com/pre/PRE16.exe" rel="nofollow">http://www.pattakon.com/pre/PRE16.exe</a> is a range-extender (like FEV’s Wankel range-extender).<br />
At <a href="http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonFly.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonFly.htm</a> is a promising unconventional application.</p>
<p>Dr. Tomazic of FEV also said: “The industry is really competitive, and everyone is looking for good technology that they can get cheaply and meet customer demands.”</p>
<p>Will the author Todd Woody ask the vice president of FEV to comment on these different, but still opposed-piston engines?</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Manousos Pattakos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Volt vs. Leaf: Choosing your green drive by Derek</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2010/07/28/volt-vs-leaf-choosing-your-green-drive/#comment-4037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 20:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4098#comment-4037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the genius that says the leaf wins:

With volt, I can plug it into any wall outlet.  With the leaf, they come install a charger at your house.  Where will you charge away from home?

Get a clue, stop living on past japanese accomplishments, the volt is getting the awards, and I guarantee the leaf sells less than half the volt within two years.  Oh, and the higher price tag is for a totally loaded, attractive car.  Not a box sure to be sitting on the side of the road when you realize you underestimated the range at higher speeds.

Driving a car shouldn&#039;t be a math test.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the genius that says the leaf wins:</p>
<p>With volt, I can plug it into any wall outlet.  With the leaf, they come install a charger at your house.  Where will you charge away from home?</p>
<p>Get a clue, stop living on past japanese accomplishments, the volt is getting the awards, and I guarantee the leaf sells less than half the volt within two years.  Oh, and the higher price tag is for a totally loaded, attractive car.  Not a box sure to be sitting on the side of the road when you realize you underestimated the range at higher speeds.</p>
<p>Driving a car shouldn&#8217;t be a math test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on California biomass-solar power plant project abandoned by gckc</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2010/07/02/california-biomass-solar-power-plant-project-abandoned/#comment-4036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gckc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4011#comment-4036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i like wombats]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like wombats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Volt vs. Leaf: Choosing your green drive by Harold</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2010/07/28/volt-vs-leaf-choosing-your-green-drive/#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4098#comment-4032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Leaf is so handicapped by the limited range that it&#039;s unpractical for most humans. The Volt also looks a million times better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Leaf is so handicapped by the limited range that it&#8217;s unpractical for most humans. The Volt also looks a million times better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PG&amp;E to let customers disable their smart meters by Diane</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/03/28/pge-to-let-customers-disable-their-smart-meters/#comment-4031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4899#comment-4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, we should not have to suffer ill health so that PG&amp;E can keep their faulty meters. However they want to charge you some pretty hefty fees for something you never wanted and for something that is making some of us ill. We have high medical costs, and this fee is an added burden to the already big problem the meters caused. Why are we having to pay for that mistake?
contact them at public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov and tell them you want the meter removed WITHOUT the fees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we should not have to suffer ill health so that PG&amp;E can keep their faulty meters. However they want to charge you some pretty hefty fees for something you never wanted and for something that is making some of us ill. We have high medical costs, and this fee is an added burden to the already big problem the meters caused. Why are we having to pay for that mistake?<br />
contact them at <a href="mailto:public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov">public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov</a> and tell them you want the meter removed WITHOUT the fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PG&amp;E to let customers disable their smart meters by Nat. Environ. Consulting</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/03/28/pge-to-let-customers-disable-their-smart-meters/#comment-4021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nat. Environ. Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4899#comment-4021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Millions of SmartMeters INCREASE ENERGY USE, as they use CUSTOMERS ELECTRICITY 25,000 times a day!!

Millions of babies, children and their families are being sickened, and will die from Microwave Radiation emitted by dangerous SmartMeters, Cell Phone Companies and their Antenna arrays. 

There are NO Environmental or Energy Benefits from Smartmeters Only Financial Benefit to Evil Corps., Pg &amp; e, and CPUC, that twist the truth.

100&#039;s of International Studies PROVE Damage to DNA from RF MIcrowave Radiation were ignored and omitted.

1. INSURANCE COMPANIES WON&#039;T INSURE THE HEALTH PROBLEMS FROM WIRELESS Smart Meters 

And Insurance companies don&#039;t sacrifice insurance premiums ($$$) for no reason.

TV NEWS VIDEO (3 minutes, 13 seconds)
http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=382


2. WIRELESS SMART METERS TRANSMIT RADIATION APPROXIMATELY 25,000 TIMES PER DAY, 24/7, not 45 seconds per day as claimed by Utility Company.

VIDEO - Radiation Measured From Smart Meter Mounted On A Home (6 min)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...


3. CELL DAMAGE, DNA BREAKS &amp; BREACHES IN THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER observed in laboratory tests from low levels of pulsed RF signal radiation as emitted by Wireless smart meters - reported by Top Wireless radiation scientists in the world:
VIDEO - http://electromagnetichealth.o...

4. THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM THAT GIVES NOBEL PRIZES ISSUES GLOBAL WARNING AGAINST WIRELESS SMART METERS.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4814...

Facing mounting opposition to wireless ‘smart’ meters being rolled out by California utilities, including a total of 34 local jurisdictions who have demanded that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) halt further installation because of widespread reports of health impacts and other concerns, the CPUC signalled at its March 10th meeting that it would ask one of California’s utilities- PG&amp;E- to develop a plan to allow customers to opt out of having a wireless meter installed- at customers’ expense. The plan is expected to be presented at the CPUC’s meeting tomorrow- Thursday, March 24th at 9am, where local government officials and a growing chorus of environmental health advocates will renew demands for an immediate moratorium on installation and hearings on health impacts. 

THIRTY-FOUR CA LOCAL GOVTS DEMAND SMART METER MORATORIUM 

Smart Meter opponents welcomed the CPUC’s admission that the deepening ‘smart’ meter crisis requires an urgent response, but slammed the meager steps proposed to address it. Lawyers protecting people from Microwave Radiation and the dangers of Smart Meters stated, “Admitting that there is a problem is the first step to fixing that problem. However, an individual opt out at customer expense is a diversion. What if you are too poor to avoid having a wireless meter- is the state saying you have to pay to avoid being totured by microwave radiation in your own home? That sounds an awful lot like extortion. What if you live in an apartment building with dozens of meters on your bedroom wall? The people of California were never asked whether we wanted these meters- nevertheless we are now paying extra for them through higher rates. And now the utilities want to charge us even more to opt out of a program that we never asked for? What is going on here?” 

The wireless meters have been widely reported to cause severe and debilitating health effects, long-term, many Cancers, Brain and Salivary gland Tumors, infertility, autism, short-term-nausea, sleep disruption, flu symptoms, headaches, dizziness, ringing in the ears, memory loss and heart palpitations among susceptible individuals due to the constant bursts of microwave radiation. The movement against wireless meters is the sharp end of a growing movement demanding health-based standards for wireless technology. Michael Peevey, who Gov. Brown has allowed to continue chairing the Commission, has continually insulted individuals with sensitivities to electromagnetic radiation, inferring that they are ‘just making it up.’ Peevey, the former President and Senior Executive of Southern California Edison (SCE) has ties to the telecommunications industry, and continues to chair the Commission that is meant to oversee the utilities, despite popular outrage about clear conflicts of interest. SCE plans to have installed 5.3 million meters between 2009 and 2012. 

Health advocates say they will continue protests and civil disobedience until a moratorium is imposed on any further installation, independent hearings on health are scheduled at the state level, and the utilities are directed to remove unwanted meters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millions of SmartMeters INCREASE ENERGY USE, as they use CUSTOMERS ELECTRICITY 25,000 times a day!!</p>
<p>Millions of babies, children and their families are being sickened, and will die from Microwave Radiation emitted by dangerous SmartMeters, Cell Phone Companies and their Antenna arrays. </p>
<p>There are NO Environmental or Energy Benefits from Smartmeters Only Financial Benefit to Evil Corps., Pg &amp; e, and CPUC, that twist the truth.</p>
<p>100&#8242;s of International Studies PROVE Damage to DNA from RF MIcrowave Radiation were ignored and omitted.</p>
<p>1. INSURANCE COMPANIES WON&#8217;T INSURE THE HEALTH PROBLEMS FROM WIRELESS Smart Meters </p>
<p>And Insurance companies don&#8217;t sacrifice insurance premiums ($$$) for no reason.</p>
<p>TV NEWS VIDEO (3 minutes, 13 seconds)<br />
<a href="http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=382" rel="nofollow">http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=382</a></p>
<p>2. WIRELESS SMART METERS TRANSMIT RADIATION APPROXIMATELY 25,000 TIMES PER DAY, 24/7, not 45 seconds per day as claimed by Utility Company.</p>
<p>VIDEO &#8211; Radiation Measured From Smart Meter Mounted On A Home (6 min)<br />
<!--YouTube Error: bad URL entered--></p>
<p>3. CELL DAMAGE, DNA BREAKS &amp; BREACHES IN THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER observed in laboratory tests from low levels of pulsed RF signal radiation as emitted by Wireless smart meters &#8211; reported by Top Wireless radiation scientists in the world:<br />
VIDEO &#8211; <a href="http://electromagnetichealth.o" rel="nofollow">http://electromagnetichealth.o</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>4. THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM THAT GIVES NOBEL PRIZES ISSUES GLOBAL WARNING AGAINST WIRELESS SMART METERS.<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/4814" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/4814</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>Facing mounting opposition to wireless ‘smart’ meters being rolled out by California utilities, including a total of 34 local jurisdictions who have demanded that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) halt further installation because of widespread reports of health impacts and other concerns, the CPUC signalled at its March 10th meeting that it would ask one of California’s utilities- PG&amp;E- to develop a plan to allow customers to opt out of having a wireless meter installed- at customers’ expense. The plan is expected to be presented at the CPUC’s meeting tomorrow- Thursday, March 24th at 9am, where local government officials and a growing chorus of environmental health advocates will renew demands for an immediate moratorium on installation and hearings on health impacts. </p>
<p>THIRTY-FOUR CA LOCAL GOVTS DEMAND SMART METER MORATORIUM </p>
<p>Smart Meter opponents welcomed the CPUC’s admission that the deepening ‘smart’ meter crisis requires an urgent response, but slammed the meager steps proposed to address it. Lawyers protecting people from Microwave Radiation and the dangers of Smart Meters stated, “Admitting that there is a problem is the first step to fixing that problem. However, an individual opt out at customer expense is a diversion. What if you are too poor to avoid having a wireless meter- is the state saying you have to pay to avoid being totured by microwave radiation in your own home? That sounds an awful lot like extortion. What if you live in an apartment building with dozens of meters on your bedroom wall? The people of California were never asked whether we wanted these meters- nevertheless we are now paying extra for them through higher rates. And now the utilities want to charge us even more to opt out of a program that we never asked for? What is going on here?” </p>
<p>The wireless meters have been widely reported to cause severe and debilitating health effects, long-term, many Cancers, Brain and Salivary gland Tumors, infertility, autism, short-term-nausea, sleep disruption, flu symptoms, headaches, dizziness, ringing in the ears, memory loss and heart palpitations among susceptible individuals due to the constant bursts of microwave radiation. The movement against wireless meters is the sharp end of a growing movement demanding health-based standards for wireless technology. Michael Peevey, who Gov. Brown has allowed to continue chairing the Commission, has continually insulted individuals with sensitivities to electromagnetic radiation, inferring that they are ‘just making it up.’ Peevey, the former President and Senior Executive of Southern California Edison (SCE) has ties to the telecommunications industry, and continues to chair the Commission that is meant to oversee the utilities, despite popular outrage about clear conflicts of interest. SCE plans to have installed 5.3 million meters between 2009 and 2012. </p>
<p>Health advocates say they will continue protests and civil disobedience until a moratorium is imposed on any further installation, independent hearings on health are scheduled at the state level, and the utilities are directed to remove unwanted meters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PG&amp;E to let customers disable their smart meters by RobertWilliams</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/03/28/pge-to-let-customers-disable-their-smart-meters/#comment-4017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RobertWilliams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4899#comment-4017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. INSURANCE COMPANIES WON&#039;T INSURE THE HEALTH PROBLEMS FROM WIRELESS Smart Meters

And Insurance companies don&#039;t sacrifice insurance premiums ($$$) for no reason.

TV NEWS VIDEO - Insurance Companies Won&#039;t Insure Wireless Device Health Risks (3 minutes, 13 seconds)
http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=382


2. WIRELESS SMART METERS TRANSMIT RADIATION APPROXIMATELY 25,000 TIMES PER DAY, 24/7, not 45 seconds per day as claimed by Utility Company.

VIDEO - Radiation Measured From Smart Meter Mounted On A Home (6 minutes, 21 seconds)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...


3. CELL DAMAGE, DNA BREAKS &amp; BREACHES IN THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER observed in laboratory tests from low levels of pulsed RF signal radiation as emitted by Wireless smart meters - reported by Top Wireless radiation scientists in the world at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco Nov 18, 2010:
VIDEO - http://electromagnetichealth.o...


4. THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM THAT GIVES NOBEL PRIZES ISSUES GLOBAL WARNING AGAINST WIRELESS SMART METERS.
2-page Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4814...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. INSURANCE COMPANIES WON&#8217;T INSURE THE HEALTH PROBLEMS FROM WIRELESS Smart Meters</p>
<p>And Insurance companies don&#8217;t sacrifice insurance premiums ($$$) for no reason.</p>
<p>TV NEWS VIDEO &#8211; Insurance Companies Won&#8217;t Insure Wireless Device Health Risks (3 minutes, 13 seconds)<br />
<a href="http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=382" rel="nofollow">http://eon3emfblog.net/?p=382</a></p>
<p>2. WIRELESS SMART METERS TRANSMIT RADIATION APPROXIMATELY 25,000 TIMES PER DAY, 24/7, not 45 seconds per day as claimed by Utility Company.</p>
<p>VIDEO &#8211; Radiation Measured From Smart Meter Mounted On A Home (6 minutes, 21 seconds)<br />
<!--YouTube Error: bad URL entered--></p>
<p>3. CELL DAMAGE, DNA BREAKS &amp; BREACHES IN THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER observed in laboratory tests from low levels of pulsed RF signal radiation as emitted by Wireless smart meters &#8211; reported by Top Wireless radiation scientists in the world at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco Nov 18, 2010:<br />
VIDEO &#8211; <a href="http://electromagnetichealth.o" rel="nofollow">http://electromagnetichealth.o</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>4. THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE IN STOCKHOLM THAT GIVES NOBEL PRIZES ISSUES GLOBAL WARNING AGAINST WIRELESS SMART METERS.<br />
2-page Press Release:<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/4814" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/4814</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Volt vs. Leaf: Choosing your green drive by RobPDX</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2010/07/28/volt-vs-leaf-choosing-your-green-drive/#comment-4010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RobPDX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4098#comment-4010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, hate to break the news to you- but the Volt versus Leaf &#039;war&#039; is not really a war. The Leaf simply wins.

Why?

The Leaf gets the equivilant of 99mpg in its 100 miles range. The Volts gets the equivilant of 97mpg in its 40 miles range.

After 40 miles, the Volt only gets 37mpg from the 40 mile mark to the 100 miles mark of the Leaf. 

At the 100 mile mark, the Volt&#039;s gas driven mpg drops the total mpg down to 49mpg for the 100 mile trip. It drops to 42 for a 200 mile trip and 40 for a 300 mile trip

The Prius get 50mpg everywhere, all the time.

So the Volt if neither a good electric car or a good hybrid. It will only fit a very very niche market of people. Either you commute far enough to where a Prius is better, or you take few enough trips that renting a vehicle is more cost efficient and eco friendly (especially since you can rent a Prius easy nowadays).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, hate to break the news to you- but the Volt versus Leaf &#8216;war&#8217; is not really a war. The Leaf simply wins.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>The Leaf gets the equivilant of 99mpg in its 100 miles range. The Volts gets the equivilant of 97mpg in its 40 miles range.</p>
<p>After 40 miles, the Volt only gets 37mpg from the 40 mile mark to the 100 miles mark of the Leaf. </p>
<p>At the 100 mile mark, the Volt&#8217;s gas driven mpg drops the total mpg down to 49mpg for the 100 mile trip. It drops to 42 for a 200 mile trip and 40 for a 300 mile trip</p>
<p>The Prius get 50mpg everywhere, all the time.</p>
<p>So the Volt if neither a good electric car or a good hybrid. It will only fit a very very niche market of people. Either you commute far enough to where a Prius is better, or you take few enough trips that renting a vehicle is more cost efficient and eco friendly (especially since you can rent a Prius easy nowadays).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Elvis Costello, Steve Jobs’ wife enlist in  Prop 23 climate fight by thorisa</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2010/10/15/elvis-costello-steve-jobs%e2%80%99-wife-enlist-in-prop-23-climate-fight/#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thorisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 04:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4477#comment-3975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome article..thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article..thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SolarCity buys East Coast’s biggest home solar installer by SolarGuy</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/02/17/solarcity-buys-east-coast%e2%80%99s-biggest-home-solar-installer/#comment-3971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SolarGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4782#comment-3971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We agree that California is an incredibly competitive market and we really need to keep our products and services very sharp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We agree that California is an incredibly competitive market and we really need to keep our products and services very sharp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Southern California Edison signs another big solar farm deal by kathy</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/02/10/southern-california-edison-signs-another-big-photovoltaic-farm-deal/#comment-3951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://greenwombat.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/southern-california-edison-signs-another-big-photovoltaic-farm-deal/#comment-3951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally intrested!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally intrested!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Report: U.S. in fast lane for 1 million electric cars by 2015 by JAy.</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/02/10/report-u-s-in-fast-lane-for-1-million-electric-cars-by-2015/#comment-3948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JAy.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://greenwombat.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/report-u-s-in-fast-lane-for-1-million-electric-cars-by-2015/#comment-3948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they are counting around 500k Volts in the electric car count?  Then does the Plug-in Hybrid Prius that comes out soon count as well?  What about the Ford Plug-in Hybrids?  If so, we should be trying to get to 2 million.

If you really only count EV&#039;s (not hybrids), then the 1 million number may be tough, especially since major auto makers have only started selling two models.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they are counting around 500k Volts in the electric car count?  Then does the Plug-in Hybrid Prius that comes out soon count as well?  What about the Ford Plug-in Hybrids?  If so, we should be trying to get to 2 million.</p>
<p>If you really only count EV&#8217;s (not hybrids), then the 1 million number may be tough, especially since major auto makers have only started selling two models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Volt vs. Leaf: Choosing your green drive by Passion</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2010/07/28/volt-vs-leaf-choosing-your-green-drive/#comment-3947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Passion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4098#comment-3947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ur cars rock i am a big fan of the chevy and nissan please make more cars love






                        PASSION]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur cars rock i am a big fan of the chevy and nissan please make more cars love</p>
<p>                        PASSION</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on China syndrome: California&#8217;s Solyndra to close solar factory by themovinlady@msn.com</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2010/11/02/china-syndrome-californias-solyndra-to-close-solar-factory/#comment-3904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[themovinlady@msn.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4583#comment-3904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep...here is OBAMA giving BILLIONS to a plant that failed almost immediatley...............Stop this loser now before he gives all of our wealth away!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep&#8230;here is OBAMA giving BILLIONS to a plant that failed almost immediatley&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;Stop this loser now before he gives all of our wealth away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NRG to acquire SunPower solar farm for $450 million by Zeph</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/01/20/nrg-to-acquire-sunpower-solar-farm-for-450-million/#comment-3902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4735#comment-3902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post, I can only imagine how strenuous the &lt;a href=&quot;http://california.construction.com/research/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;building construction&lt;/a&gt; for a project of this magnitude is going to be. From what I have been reading environmentalists strongly appose projects like this because of their effect on the desert ecosystems. Projects like this significantly help out our environment, but it is unfortunate they must be done at the expense of native animals and plants. This is a very interesting topic, and it is definitely something I want to learn more about. I usually go to McGraw Hill&#039;s California Construction site when I want to find out more on issues like this one. It has a ton of information on construction news happening around California. While I occasionally work with McGraw Hill, they have been a favorite construction resource of mine long before we started working together. If you are like me, and enjoy staying current on construction news and information in California, check out McGraw Hill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, I can only imagine how strenuous the <a href="http://california.construction.com/research/" rel="nofollow">building construction</a> for a project of this magnitude is going to be. From what I have been reading environmentalists strongly appose projects like this because of their effect on the desert ecosystems. Projects like this significantly help out our environment, but it is unfortunate they must be done at the expense of native animals and plants. This is a very interesting topic, and it is definitely something I want to learn more about. I usually go to McGraw Hill&#8217;s California Construction site when I want to find out more on issues like this one. It has a ton of information on construction news happening around California. While I occasionally work with McGraw Hill, they have been a favorite construction resource of mine long before we started working together. If you are like me, and enjoy staying current on construction news and information in California, check out McGraw Hill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NRG to acquire SunPower solar farm for $450 million by Darwin</title>
		<link>http://thegreenwombat.com/2011/01/20/nrg-to-acquire-sunpower-solar-farm-for-450-million/#comment-3901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegreenwombat.com/?p=4735#comment-3901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NRG will soon have electric vehicle charging stations in Houston: http://www.energyinyourlife.com/article.php?t=100000159]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NRG will soon have electric vehicle charging stations in Houston: <a href="http://www.energyinyourlife.com/article.php?t=100000159" rel="nofollow">http://www.energyinyourlife.com/article.php?t=100000159</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
