When Green Wombat made a purchase at the San Francisco Apple store the other day, the salesperson asked if I’d prefer to have the receipt emailed to me rather than printed out. Brilliant. Imagine saving untold tons of paper used to print receipts that the vast majority of consumers probably just end up tossing in the trash (along with the paper or plastic bag that a clerk reflexively asked if they wanted). In an age when just about everyone and their cat has an email address, and when many purchases are made with debit or credit cards, paper receipts increasingly are an anachronism in a global warming world. It would be revealing to calculate the environmental impact of ridding the planet of those little scraps of paper – in terms of greenhouse gas emissions eliminated, toxic chemicals avoided and forests preserved. Not to mention the improvement to the corporate bottom line. The reality is that receipts, paper or electronic,
aren’t necessary for most daily purchases – already outlets like Starbucks or Peets will swipe your debit or credit card without printing proof of payment. And for the big buys an email receipt is way easier to find on your hard drive

than a piece of paper stuck in some desk drawer. Apple (AAPL) spokesperson Steve Dowling tells Green Wombat that the e-receipt option has been available in the company’s U.S. stores since late 2005 – when you make a credit card purchase – and is also offered in the U.K. (Though it hasn’t been widely publicized, like other green Apple initiatives until recently.) Acceptance of e-receipts will obviously take some change in consumer behavior. But it’s one of those small but significant moves toward sustainability that Wal-Mart (WMT), Dell (DELL) and other companies that have put themselves on the green path could adopt. Green Wombat is sold: by the time I made it from the Apple store counter to the street, my receipt had appeared on my mobile phone.
Posted in corporate sustainability | 15 Comments »

Green Wombat is traveling today but I’ve got a layover in London and this bit of click bait popped up on the BlackBerry as I deplaned. According to a survey conducted by advertising conglomerate WPP, United States and U.K. consumers perceive the following to be the top 10 "green brands":
-
Whole Foods
-
Wild Oats
-
Trader Joe’s
-
Toyota
-
Honda
-
Sub Zero
-
Ikea
-
Body Shop
-
GE
-
Aveda
The results are based on 1,504 online interviews in the U.S. and 1,525 interviews in the U.K. According to the WPP subsidiaries that conducted the survey, ”respondents were screened to meet the following criteria: Age 18 or over, gender, age, and region was weighted based on U.S. and U.K. census information, respondents rated only the brands that they were familiar with.”

Given that it’s the middle of the night in the U.S. as Green Wombat writes, further details of the survey’s methodology aren’t available at the moment – such as the precise questions asked, why consumers think these companies are eco-friendly, the statistical margin of error and whether any of these green brands are WPP clients. It’s a curious list: No surprise that Whole Foods (WFMI) – which is acquiring No. 2 green brand Wild Oats – Toyota (TM), Honda (HMC) and the Body Shop made the list. But high-end appliance maker Sub Zero? And GE’s (GE) ecomagination" campaign appears to be paying off.
"No longer can corporations just say they offer fuel-efficient vehicles, organic foods or energy-efficient products it is now a cost of entry in many industries and corporations need to begin thinking ahead," according to WPP. 
"Corporations must consider the next level of greenness such as ensuring their overall business practices are sustainable and that the greenness at the supermarket or car dealership represents greenness in bringing the item to market." The survey found that the typical greenie in the U.S. tends to be a younger woman who earns about $50k. Her British counterpart, on the other hands, is more likely to be older, male and highly educated.
Posted in green marketing | 13 Comments »

Yahoo will donate a fleet of hybrid taxi cabs to the town that wins its "Greenest City in America" challenge. The giveaway marks the launch of Yahoo’s (YHOO) new eco-site Yahoo Green, which the Internet giant bills as a "one-stop resource for the growing number of environmentally-concerned consumers." So, how do you help your city score points so it can replace some of those carbon-belching yellow cabs with cleaner hybrid versions? By trading in the SUV for a Civic, perhaps? Or installing solar panels? Nah. You – and Yahoo – win by accumulating points when you go to Yahoo and ask environment-related question on Yahoo Answers, use "eco-friendly mobile search terms" on Yahoo’s mobile service, and take a green pledge to do things like use compact fluorescent light bulbs, adjust your thermostat by two degrees and carpool to work once a week. Yahoo will even send you an energy-efficient CFL. Yahoo will unveil the "greenest" – or at least the most Yahoo-friendly – city on June 8. It kicked off the contest today in New York City, where it’s giving the Big Apple a squadron of hybrid cabs – Ford (F) Escapes, judging by the photo. But if you really want to green up the taxi fleet, why not donate the much more fuel efficient, albeit smaller, Toyota (T) Prius or Honda Civic (HMC) hybrid. Heck, even a plain-vanilla Corolla gets better mileage than a hybrid SUV.
Posted in green cars | 14 Comments »

Paul Zeven, CEO of Philips Electronics’ North American operations, dropped by Business 2.0 yesterday to chat with Green Wombat about the the future of LED lighting and the company’s support of a campaign to eliminate planet-warming incandescent light bulbs. In March the electronics and lighting giant called for the phase-out of traditional light bulbs in the U.S. by 2016 in favor of compact fluorescent bulbs, which use 70 percent less electricity and last about a decade. But going green in this case would seem to be the equivalent of going out business, given that incandescents comprise 95 percent of Philips’ (PHG) worldwide light bulb market. But Zeven says Philips is positioning itself for the future with its CFL products and LED technology. (Philips owns Lumileds, a Silicon Valley company that makes LEDs.) In any event, he says the phaseout of incandescents is inevitable, citing the growing movement to ban the bulb: Australia is outlawing traditional light bulbs, Ontario recently moved to do the same while California is considering legislation to bar the sale of incandescents beginning in 2012. Zeven notes that Philips has also been in discussions with European Union officials about phasing out traditional bulbs. "What we’re seeing is that consumer demand, the actions of the retailers and the media are making this an issue and that alternatives are needed," says Zeven, a dapper native of the Netherlands who runs Philips’ North American operations from New York.
A few hours before our meeting Wal-Mart (WMT), which aims to sell 100 million CFLs by 2008, announced that it was working with Philips, GE (GE), Osram Sylvania and Lights of America to slash the amount of toxic mercury used in the high-efficiency bulbs to reduce their environmental impact and increase consumer acceptance. "Wal-Mart can have a tremendous impact," says Zeven. He was in San Francisco to give a speech at a conference and afterwards he said a woman approached him to say she had replaced all 129 light bulbs in her house with CFLs and had given a package of the bulbs to her father. "Two to three years ago most people had not heard of CFLs," he says. The impact on global warming from something as simple as changing a light bulb is staggering: If the United States switched to CFLs it would save $18 billion a year in
electricity costs and eliminate 158 million tons of carbon dioxide
from the atmosphere – the equivalent of shutting down 18 coal-fired
power plants, according to the Lighting Efficiency Coalition, coalition of environmental groups and corporations.
But Zeven sees CFLs as an intermediate step until LED technology can be perfected and the cost lowered for mass home and office use – something he predicts is another 10 or 20 years away. An LED – light emitting diode – is essentially a semiconductor chip and uses less electricity than even a CFL. LEDs theoretically can last for decades, dramatically lowering greenhouse gas emissions. Lights that virtually never burn out, of course, also changes the economics of the lighting business. "It’s a whole new ballgame for us as an industry," Zeven says, noting that there will always be new demand as cars, televisions and other gadgets increasingly rely on LEDs.
Posted in energy efficiency | 3 Comments »
Tesla Motors this morning announced a $45 million round of financing, bringing its total funding to $105 million as the company prepares to ship its hotly-anticipated all-electric Roadster this fall. The Silicon Valley startup is backed by a who’s who of the tech elite: individual investors include PayPal co-founder Elon Musk – who serves as Tesla’s chairman – Larry Page, Sergey Brin and eBay employee No. 1 Jeff Skoll. Technology Partners and Musk co-led the latest round of financing. New investor Capricorn Investment Group was joined by previous backers Vantage Point Venture Partners,
Draper Fisher Jurvetson, JP Morgan Bay Area Equity Fund (JPM), Valor Equity Partners and Compass Venture Partners. Technology Partners’ Ira Ehrenpreis joins Tesla’s board as does Valor CEO Antonio Gracias. The new round will help fund the development of Tesla’s next zero-emissions car, a four-door sports sedan called WhiteStar slated to hit the streets in the 2010 model year. The first production run of the $92,000 Roadster ($100,000 fully loaded) sold out, but the company is taking orders for the 2008 version on its site. Vroom.
Posted in green cars | Leave a Comment »
As spring approaches, the greening of Corporate America continues
apace. First financial services giant Citi (C) this week unveiled a $50 billion green investment initiative and today IBM (IBM) said it will spend a billion a year to green energy-hogging data centers. The Big Green project will deploy 850 "energy efficiency architects" to evaluate electricity usage in its data centers and those of its clients and then use a mix of hardware and software technologies to cut power consumption by 42 percent. That will eliminate an estimated 7,439 tons of greenhouse gas emissions a year, according to IBM. The tech giant said the Big Green initiative will allow it to double computing capacity without spiking energy usage or increasing CO2 emissions. Meanwhile, California utility PG&E (PCG) said today it’s working with IBM to slash electricity consumption in its West Coast data centers by 80 percent. The utility will accomplish that in part by replacing Unix 300 servers with six IBM System p5 servers. Use of IBM’s virtualization software will increase the server’s utilization from 10 percent of capacity to more than 80 percent while a water-cooling technology will cut heat emissions from the servers by 60 percent.
Posted in enviro capitalism | 3 Comments »
Citi, the financial services multinational formerly called Citigroup, has pledged to spend up to $50 billion over the next decade to invest in renewable energy and other green technologies. That pile of cash includes $10 billion Citi (C) previously promised expend on efforts to combat global warming. Upping the ante over Bank of America’s (BAC) $20 billion green lending program announced in March, Citi says it will spend $10 billion to cut greenhouse gas emissions from its global operations by 10 percent by 2011. But the bulk of the cash – $31 billion – will go for investments in geothermal, solar, wind and other renewable energy projects and technologies. (Citi, for example, is financing Portuguese utility EDP’s $2 billion takeover of Horizon Wind Energy, the largest wind farm company in the United States. Citi has also invested in Indian wind energy company Suzlon.) The willingness of banks to finance big renewable energy projects will be crucial to the success of current plans to build utility-scale solar power plants in California and the Southwest. California utilities, for instance of contracted for nearly 2 gigawatts of solar power, but financing the plants, which can cost hundreds of millions of dollars to build, remains a big hurdle.
Posted in enviro capitalism | 7 Comments »

In another sign of Wal-Mart’s power to put the economy on a more sustainable path, the retail giant today said it is working with light bulb makers GE (GE), Royal Philips (PHG), Osram Sylvania and Lights of America to slash the mercury content of high-efficiency compact fluorescent bulbs by an average 33 percent. Mercury is a toxic substance and its use in CFLs presents a conundrum for the widespread adoption of light bulbs that use 70 percent less electricity than traditional incandescent lighting: will using CFLs to lower greenhouse gases create a hazardous waste nightmare? Others worry that consumers will be less likely to buy CFLs if they can’t just toss them in the rubbish bin when they burn out – though the bulbs’ lifespan is about 10 years. Wal-Mart (WMT) has committed to selling 100 million CFLs by 2008 and it also has launched a campaign to work with its suppliers to reduce the environmental impact of their manufacturing processes. The light bulb manufacturers will reduce the mercury content of their CFLs as much as 50 percent below the 5 milligram per bulb standard set by the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. People concerned about the environment and their health can buy these CFLs with a clear conscience, said Natural Resources Defense Council senior scientist Noah Horowitz in a statement released by Wal-Mart. The retailer also cited U.S. EPA stats that found that a coal-fired power plant emits four times the mercury to power an incandescent bulb than a CFL.
Posted in enviro capitalism | Leave a Comment »

photo: celeste1992
These days you can’t put on a conference without the obligatory nod toward carbon neutrality – "conference-goers’ business-class travel, town cars, bar bills and gratuitous swag will be offset by the planting of a forest in Botswana." So when the email with the subject line "2007 JavaOne Conference Gets Greener With Significant Efforts To Conserve, Recycle and Reuse" popped up on the BlackBerry, Green Wombat’s eyes glazed over just like they did back in ’99 when a chirpy PR person would call with news of the the latest $10 million round for the latest pets.com clone. But when the wombat got off deadline, a closer look at Sun Microsystems (SUNW) efforts to green up its annual JavaOne software confab now underway in San Francisco proved a bit of an eye-opener. Sun isn’t trying to carbon-neutralize the geek fest. It’s simply taking common-sense measures to reduce the environmental impact of such events. But the numbers are striking and serve as reminder that changing little things can have a big impact. For instance, Sun says that instead of inundating attendees with the usual paper blizzard, it did all its promotion of the event online. Not a radical
move these days but one 
that the company claims will save 4.6 tons of paper (sparing 111 trees), lower greenhouse
gas emissions by an equivalent of 13 tons, cut solid waste by 5.1 tons and reduce
wastewater by nearly 79,000 gallons. Now take online all the brochures, factsheets and other paper handed out by exhibitors and those numbers would skyrocket. Sun also touts its "Bike to JavaOne" initiative and its swag bag containing an "organic T-Shirt, note pad made from recycled paper and printed with soy ink." Better yet, why not dispense with the goodie bag – and backpacks – all together next year. Unless you’re an uber-geek, most of them will end up in a landfill before the 2008 JavaOne rolls around. (backpack photo: kasiat)
Posted in carbon neutral | Leave a Comment »
General Motors today became the first automaker to call for a mandatory cap on greenhouse gas emissions and legislation to reduce the threat of global warming. GM (GM) and 11 other industrial behemoths joined a coalition of big corporations and environmental groups that form the United States Climate Action Partnership, or USCAP. Also coming on board were oil giants Shell (RDS-B) and ConocoPhillips (COP), insurance company American International Group (AIG), aluminum maker Alcan (AL), medical instruments company Boston Scientific (BSX), farm equipment maker Deere (DE), Dow Chemical (DOW), pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), financial services firm Marsh (MMC), PepsiCo (PBG), and electronics company Siemens (SI). The Nature Conservancy and the National Wildlife Federation joined USCAP today as well. The addition of a wide cross-section of the nation’s industrial might – with a collective $1.7 trillion in revenues – to the coalition furthers boxes in the Bush administration as Congress prepares to pass legislation to impose a national cap on greenhouse gas emissions followed by some sort of carbon trading market. If your core consistency – the titans of industry – are calling for regulation, it gets a bit difficult to argue that mandatory greenhouse gas reductions will hurt the economy.
GM’s call for a gas cap is a watershed. It, along with the other automakers, have fought to quash efforts to regulate vehicle carbon dioxide emissions in California and elsewhere and have long opposed efforts to raise fuel efficiency standards. How GM will reconcile such campaigns with its new call for laws to do what it has opposed for so many years will be interesting, to say the least. GM is very pleased to join USCAP to proactively address the concerns and applauds its members for recognizing the important role that technology achieving an economy-wide solution, said GM chairman Rick Wagoner said in a statement. A central element as we see it is energy diversity being able vehicles that can be powered by many different energy sources and advanced to help displace petroleum and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
With this many Fortune 500 companies wanting a seat at the climate change table, a national greenhouse gas law is inevitable. But Democrats and environmentalists will undoubtedly face pressure to water down legislation to make it amenable – and less costly – to corporate America. Set your greenwashing detectors on high.
Posted in global warming | 2 Comments »

