Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Solaicx
Silicon Valley chip equipment maker Applied Materials, which last
year moved into the solar cell business, is participating in a $27.1
million round of financing for Solaicx, an erstwhile competitor with an
innovative process for making the silicon wafers used in photovoltaic
cells. Applied’s venture arm (AMAT) also invested in the Santa Clara
startup in an earlier round. The current round is being led by D.E.
Shaw with Mitsui Ventures, Firsthand Capital Management, Big Sky
Ventures, and Greenhouse Capital Partners also participating. Business
2.0 magazine, where Green Wombat is an editor, featured Solaicx in a
November story about the Silicon Valley solar boom by B2 senior writers Tom McNichol and Michael V. Copeland:

There’s a missile-bunker vibe you get when walking into Solaicx,
a Silicon Valley startup that manufactures the silicon wafers that are
the building blocks of solar panels.

In one half of the
nondescript Santa Clara warehouse, three men sit hunched on a wood
platform 8 feet above the cement floor, their eyes locked on two
monitors. The screens show data and video gathered from a 24-foot-tall
steel tower. The tower begins in a squat, gourd-shaped base and tapers
to a cannon-size column with a long drum spinning slowly on top. Thick
power cables snake down its sides. Another sci-fi-looking tower rises
up off to one side of the building.

Inside the tower that has
everyone’s attention, molten silicon is being added to a thin,
8-inch-long rod, or "seed," of silicon. After 15 hours of precise
spinning and pulling, the seed will grow to a mirror-finished ingot
about 4 feet long and weighing more than 150 pounds. If it’s perfect –
and that is the point of Solaicx’s cutting-edge technology – it will
form a single crystal matrix, which is then trimmed and sliced into
1,000 wafers that sell for $5 apiece and are used by companies like
General Electric to build the most efficient solar modules on the
market today.

Bob Ford, Solaicx’s CEO, bounds down from the
platform and brushes a hand along an already cool ingot waiting to be
cut into wafers. His finger stops on a thin seam running laser-straight
down the side of the overgrown crystal. "That’s what you want to see,"
Ford says. "It means every atom is aligned. I’ve had guys literally
knock on our front door asking if we can supply them with $5 million
worth of these wafers a month. We can sell as much as we can make."

In
fact, before Solaicx even flipped the switch on its first silicon
crystal grower, GE promised to buy every wafer the four-year-old
company can crank out.

Solar_array
photo: wookiee

In one of the biggest solar deals to date, Wal-Mart will buy 22 million kilowatt-hours of greenhouse gas-free electricity produced from solar arrays to be installed as a pilot project at 22 stores in California and Hawaii. The retail giant estimates the move will reduce planet-warming emissions by 6,500 to 10,000 metric tons a year. The solar systems will be installed by SunPower’s (SPWR) PowerLight subsidiary at seven California stores, by SunEdison at four stores in California and four in Hawaii, and by BP Solar (BP) at seven stores in the Golden State. Wal-Mart (WMT) will buy electricity produced by the arrays at market or below market rates and retain ownership of any Renewable Credits. RECs potentially could be worth a bundle if they’re allowed to be traded on carbon markets under consideration in California and Hawaii. For instance, a company that exceeds its limit on greenhouse gas emissions could buy Wal-Mart RECs, which represent CO2 avoided through the use of solar energy. Hawaii late last week became the second state after California to pass a cap on greenhouse gas emissions. The solar companies will arrange financing and installation of the arrays and retain ownership. In SunEdison’s case, the Maryland company will finance, operate and own the solar arrays it installs for Wal-Mart. A SunPower spokesperson told Green Wombat that the San Jose company is working with a third party to finance the deal but hasn’t finalized the arrangements. When the power purchase agreements expires, Wal-Mart will have the option to renew the deals, move the equipment to other stores or buy the solar arrays. SunPower, which previously installed solar arrays at three other Wal-Mart stores, will build systems for seven stores to produce 4.6 megawatts of electricity. Each solar array will provide about a quarter of a store’s power, according to SunPower.

Hawaii
photo: reeflections

Hawaii has become the second U.S. state to pass legislation capping greenhouse gas emissions. Modeled after California’s landmark law, Hawaii’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2007 requires the island state to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. A task force would have until the end of 2009 to devise a regulatory plan to achieve the greenhouse gas emissions limits. Like California, Hawaii will consider a carbon trading market as one way to meet the targets. The Democrat-controlled Legislature passed the global warming law late last week by a huge margin, with only four legislators voting against it. Republican Governor Linda Lingle has until July 10 to act on the legislation.

Californiavictoria_mou_1Arnold Schwarzenegger is fond of calling California a nation-state and accordingly he practices his own foreign policy, forging an international alliance to combat global warming. On Friday the California governor signed a memorandum of understanding in Los Angeles with Steve Bracks, the premier of the Australian state of Victoria. The two Pacific Rim states agreed to share technology and develop policies to develop international carbon trading markets, reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, foster clean energy technologies and worth together on energy efficiency standards.  Schwarzenegger has signed a similar accord with U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair and he has collaborated on green policies with the premier of British Columbia. But the California-Victorian alliance is particularly noteworthy, representing a growing rebellion against national governments perceived as obstructionist on global warming. "This agreement exemplifies the leadership role of sub-national jurisdictions in driving global climate change solutions," the document states. Australia, of course, is the only other major industrialized country to join the United States in refusing to enact the Kyoto Accord. The country of 20 million is heavily dependent on cheap and highly polluting coal and conservative Prime Minister John Howard, a close ally of President George Bush, has doggedly resisted efforts to impose emissions limits. Victoria, Australia’s second-largest state, is governed by the left-leaning Labor Party and is the California of Australia when it comes to promoting clean energy and policies to fight global warming. (Victoria, for instance, is helping fund the world’s largest photovoltaic solar power station.)  Howard is in a tough re-election fight, and as the country suffers through one of its worst droughts on record, climate change has emerged as a major campaign issue. The prime minister is bashed almost daily by the Labor Party environment spokesman, former Midnight Oil frontman Peter Garrett, and now he’s got the Terminator doing photo-ops with the opposition.

Apple_green_3 Steve Jobs’s green manifesto is bubbling about the blogosphere and much is being made over whether  (AAPL) waived the white flag under pressure from a Greenpeace campaign, which labeled the company an ecotard – as Fake Steve might put it – for its past "failure to take a green initiative."  Of much more interest to Green Wombat than the pissing match between Jobs and the enviros, or the not-so-veiled jabs he made at rivals, is how Apple has raised the bar on environmental disclosure. Ironically enough, given Jobs’s obsession with keeping secrets, he detailed the amount of various toxic chemicals present in Apple’s computers and iPods and disclosed future manufacturing plans to remove them. Of course, all this served to show that Apple, despite its previous opaqueness, is greener than its competitors. Still, for all the press releases issued by Dell (DELL), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Sun Microsystems (SUNW) trumpeting various environmental initiatives, few have discussed in detail such topics as the arsenic, mercury, cadmium and hexavalent chromium content of their products and specific plans to eliminate the chemicals. For instance, Jobs said Apple will begin to sell mercury-free Macs this year that use LED backlight technology for their screens and will also begin using arsenic-free glass. And he revealed that Apple phased out the use of some hazardous materials in recent years thanks to innovative design. Jobs pledged to completely end the use of others by the end of 2008. Apple has been slammed for its e-recycling polices and the fact that its flooding the planet with millions of iPods that will soon be discarded for the latest model. Jobs said the company this summer would expand its free take-back policy at U.S. Apple stores to all outlets worldwide. He also noted that Apple makes its computers with high-quality materials in demand by recyclers. "Few of our competitors do the same."

"We apologize for leaving you in the dark for this long," Jobs concluded, promising to provide updates on the company’s green deeds, including an examination of its products’ carbon foot print. "Apple is already a leader in innovation and engineering, and we are applying these same talents to become an environmental leader."  Coming from another company that might just be a standard-issue feel-good line. If Jobs’s becomes as obsessive about the environmental design of iPods and iPhones as he does their look, feel and function, then other consumer electronics makers are about to face some real competition on the green front.

Why Apple left increasingly eco-conscious customers unenlightened about what appears to be years of work to remove toxic chemicals from its computers and gadgets remains a public relations strategy best plumbed by bloggers like David Swain at Clean PR.

A Green SUV?

Ford_escape_seatsWill you feel better about driving a planet-warming SUV if you’re sitting on seat covers made from 100 percent post-industrial waste? Ford hopes so. Its 2008 Escape Hybrid sports seat fabric crafted from discarded plastic and polyester fabrics "that would have otherwise ended up in landfills." (Though an all dead-cow interior remains an option.) The eco-friendly fabric is also available on the gas-guzzling version of the Escape. "The new fabric offers the same feel and durability of virgin-fiber fabrics, and was subjected to a battery of tests to verify its durability, seam strength, color consistency, and even new-car smell," according to the tag attached to a shopping bag made from the seat material express-mailed to Green Wombat from Motor City. (A sniff test confirms that new-car smell, and the material looks and feels better than that found in the last Detroit-made rental Green Wombat drove. And as Ford PR person cleverly notes, the bag could come in handy in San Francisco, which has banned non-biodegradable plastic bags.)

Now, it’s hard to whack Ford (F) for showing some eco-imagination, as it were.  And a 34-mpg hybrid small SUV like the Escape is certainly better than no hybrid at
all. (Full disclosure lest I be flickrized: Green Wombat drives a so-called cute ute himself, a Toyota 

Ford_hybrid_escape_4
(TM) RAV4.) Yet it’s way too obvious to point out that offering recycled seating on one product line will hardly offset the greenhouse emissions produced by such crimes against nature as the Ford Expedition and the F-150. And we won’t even go into the campaigns by Ford – and General Motors (GM), DaimlerChrysler (DCX), Honda (HMC) and most of the other automakers – to quash efforts to raise fuel-efficiency standards and a California law that limits cars’ carbon spew.

The recycled seat covers are made by InterfaceFabric, a division of ecologically oriented Atlanta textile company Interface (IFSIA). Interface estimates that the green-seated Escape will eliminate the
equivalent of 1.8 million pounds of carbon dioxide and 7 million kilowatt
Ford_escape_bag_2
hours of electricity consumption while saving 600,000 gallons of water.  Impressive. So why not make InterfaceFabric’s material standard equipment on all Ford vehicles and urge other automakers to follow suit. In fact, if you want to really get post-industrial about it, start using recycled materials on dashboards, moldings and other interior trim.  There should be plenty of raw materials on hand when gasoline hits $5 a gallon and Suburbans, Tundras and Tahoes start landing on the scrap heap of automotive history.

Optisolar_2
A solar power plant in the Great White North? Thin-film solar startup OptiSolar has signed a deal to build a 40-megawatt photovoltaic power station about 180 miles west of Toronto. The project, to be rolled out in 10-megawatt stages, will be – for the moment – the world’s largest PV power plant. Canada isn’t exactly known for its sunny skies but it does offer something solar power companies won’t find south of the border: a premium price for green electricity. The Ontario government will pay OptiSolar 42 (Canadian) cents a kilowatt hour – nearly 10 times the standard rate. In this case, Ontario signed a 20-year contract at that rate with OptiSolar’s Canadian subsidiary. Germany, Portugal and Spain pay similar above-market rates and as a result Europe is experiencing a solar power plant building boom. It’s the kind of deal that thin-film solar startups like OptiSolar need to get their technology out of the lab and into the field. Thin-film companies promise to significantly lower the cost of solar energy by printing solar cells on metal sheets. Although the efficiency of thin-film cells is far less than the solar flat panel solar cells produced by companies like SunPower (SPWR), the ability to continuously produce them in rolls of thin material is expected to significantly lower production costs.  A 6-megawatt thin-film power plant recently went online in Germany using cells made by First Solar (FSLR). Another Silicon Valley startup, Nanosolar, has attracted $100 million in venture capital fundng and is building a factory in San Jose that would triple the U.S.’s solar cell manufacturing capability. OptiSolar has remained in stealth mode, saying little about its plans or business. (Though company representatives did show up at PG&E’s (PCG) bidder’s conference in April where the California utility solicited offers to build renewable energy power plants.)

Img_2932
photo: green wombat

The land rush to build solar power plants in California is attracting prospectors from around the world. PG&E (PCG) earlier this month held its annual bidder’s conference to solicit proposals to supply the utility renewable energy. Green Wombat has obtained a partial list of attendees and it shows that everyone from Silicon Valley startups to Spanish solar power station operators are looking to cash in on the state’s growing demand for green electricity. Among those present:

  • OptiSolar, a Bay Area thin-film solar startup.
  • Bright Source Energy, the new incarnation of solar pioneer Luz, which built nine solar power plants (photo above) in the Mojave in the 1980s.
  • FPL Energy (FPL), the renewable energy division of utility FPL and the current operator of seven of the old Luz plants.
  • Green Volts, a San Francisco-based concentrating photovoltaic solar startup.
  • Solucar Power, the U.S. subsidiary of Spanish solar power station operator Abengoa.
  • SolarMission Technologies, the U.S. arm of Australian solar tower company EnviroMission.
  • Boeing (BA), whose Spectrolab subsidiary makes high-efficiency solar cells. In the 1980s Boeing experimented with Stirling dishes designed to produce utility-scale solar energy.
  • SunEdison, the Maryland solar developer which just broke ground on an 8-megawatt photovoltaic power station in Colorado to supply green electrons to utility Xcel Energy (XEL).
  • Sempra Generation, the power plant subsidiary of energy giant Sempra Energy (SRE), which owns one California’s largest utilities, San Diego Gas & Electric.

Other participants came from China (Solarfun) and Japan (J-POWER USA Development). In the 2007 request for proposals, PG&E is looking for bids to build up to 800 megawatts of renewable energy.

SunpowerSolar panel maker SunPower’s (SPWR) acquisition last year of solar systems installer PowerLight is looking more and more like a savvy move, judging by the first quarter earnings the San Jose company released Thursday. It was the first earnings report since the deal closed, and it was no coincidence that revenues jumped 92 percent over the previous quarter and that SunPower said it was on track to take in more than a billion dollars in 2008. Based up the road in Berkeley, PowerLight installs large commercial solar arrays and lately has been expanding into photovoltaic solar power plants. Last month a 11-megawatt solar plant it built in Portugal opened. Just this week, PowerLight broke ground on a 15-megawatt solar power station in Nevada and announced that it is building or supplying equipment to PV power plants in Spain that will produce a total of 61 megawatts. (About 35 percent of SunPower’s revenues came from Spain in the first quarter, according to ThinkEquity.) Closer to home, PowerLight recently installed a 1.3-megawatt rooftop array on two Tiffany’s (TIF) warehouses in New Jersey and signed a deal to build a 1-megawatt system for chip equipment maker Applied Materials (AMAT) at its Silicon Valley campus. SunPower CEO Tom Werner said in a statement that the company anticipates that by 2012 it will have cut in half the cost of an installed solar array by integrating its high efficiency solar cells with PowerLight’s systems.

Lg_washerAs California faces another drought, the state has sued the federal government over its refusal to let the Left Coast set strict water-efficiency standards for washing machines. Five years ago, the Legislature passed a law requiring that washers sold after 2007 use 8.5 gallons or less per cubic foot of capacity, declining to six gallons by 2010. That means a typical household would nearly halve the amount of water it uses annually to wash clothes – from 15,366 gallons to 8,271 gallons. And more efficient washers use less electricity and natural gas.  But it would effectively mean that consumers would need to switch to more expensive  water-saving front-loading machines. That didn’t sit well with washer makers. The trade group that represents GE (GE), Whirlpool (WHR), LG (LPL) and other manufacturers lobbied the U.S. Department of Energy to deny a waiver that would allow California to enact standards stricter than federal requirements. Which, of course, was a bit schizophrenic as these companies make handsome profit margins on front-loading washers and promote their water-and-electricity saving features as good for the planet in the age of Lg_washing_machine_gray_2
global warming. (For the record, the Green Wombat family uses a front-loader.) "Opponents predict The End of the Laundry World as We Know It if DOE grants a waiver to California," wrote an attorney for the California Energy Commission last year in a petition to the Department of Energy. "Their assertions are premised entirely on the dubious proposition that the California… standard will eliminate every single top-loading washing machine."

California long has set higher appliance efficiency standards – it’s why Californians’ per capita energy use has remained flat while the population has soared – and the feds routinely grant waivers. But in this case the energy bureaucrats, who by the way promote the use of efficient front-load washers, listened to the appliance industry. Late last week the California Energy Commission sued DOE in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, asking that the state washing machine standard be upheld. "Less water use in California clothes washers will eventually save enough to supply a city the size of San Diego every year," said Energy Commission Chair Jackalyne Pfannenstiel in a statement today. We’re going to need every Lg_washer_blue
drop:  today’s papers report that  the Sierra snowpack – where we get most of our drinking water – is at its lowest level since 1988.

Then again, maybe the DOE’s denial is a bit of red state-blue state politics. After all, front-loaders are de rigueur in peacenik Europe and have caught on here in the coastal strongholds among ecosexuals and other treehuggers who like their appliances green and well-designed.

A tip of the hat to Vindu Goel, Green Wombat’s former colleague at the San Jose Mercury News, for the tip about the lawsuit.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started