Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘solar energy’ Category

solar-energy-bill-2.pngWith Congress back in session, renewable energy proponents are girding for a battle over legislation that could make or break the nascent solar power industry.

At stake in the energy bill now before Congress is the survival of a 30 percent investment tax credit that makes large-scale solar power plants a viable option for utilities under pressure to cut greenhouse gas emissions by obtaining more of their electricity from renewable sources. On the home front, a similar tax credit for residential solar installations is up for grabs as Congress tries to reconcile House and Senate versions of the energy legislation.

“There are at least eight or nine well-funded companies that are actually making great progress in developing large-scale solar,” says Joshua Bar-Lev, vice president for regulatory affairs for Oakland, Calif.,-based solar power plant developer BrightSource Energy. “I don’t know if any of them are going to be able to finance projects and get the permits they need without these tax credits.”

The solar companies and their allies in the utility industry and on Wall Street had been pressing for an eight-year extension of the investment tax credit. They also want to abolish a prohibition on utilities from taking advantage of the incentive if they invest directly in solar power plants. But since word hit the street that Congressional leaders were considering stripping out the incentives to speed passage of the complex legislation — catchall bills that will affect the fate of nearly every energy-related industry, from Big Oil to biofuels — solar proponents have been converging on the Capitol in an 11th-hour lobbying frenzy.

“Things are very uncertain at the moment,” says Chris O’Brien, an executive at solar panel maker Sharp who serves as chairman of the Solar Energy Industries Association, a trade group. “In recent years, we’ve seen a very sharp increase in corporate investment, project investment and financing for solar technology companies and solar projects. There’s great concern that the U.S. market continue to grow.”

Like other renewable energy sectors, solar has lived and died at the hands of tax incentives. In the 1980s a California tax break encouraged the construction of the state’s first utility-scale power plants by Luz International, founded by BrightSource’s chairman. When the incentives evaporated with the return of cheap energy that decade, the company’s business disappeared (though those Mojave Desert solar power stations continue to operate).

Global warming fears, renewable energy mandates imposed on utilities and a flood of venture capital has revived Big Solar over the past two years. The industry argues that longer term tax incentives must be put in place to ensure solar power plant builders have enough time to break into the electricity market and achieve economies of scale that will drive down the cost of green energy. This time around, the solar entrepreneurs have attracted the support of utilities like PG&E (PCG) and Edison International (EIX) as well as Wall Street titans like Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS), both of which have invested in renewable energy companies. (Morgan Stanley, for instance, is backing BrightSource.)

“We’ve gone to Congress and talked to members about the need for multi-year commitments so we have certainty,” Rick Carter, PG&E’s director of federal government relations, told Green Wombat. “What we’ve seen over past couple years is stop-and-go with tax credits. If you have multi-year leads to build facilities, that doesn’t work.”

Take California, for example. Negotiations between a solar energy company and a utility over a power purchase agreement can last more than a year and it can take another three or four years to to obtain regulatory approval for a solar power plant, secure the site and then get the facility built and operating. PG&E, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) all have signed long-term power purchase agreements for solar power plants that will be financed and built over the next several years.

Given that the prime solar sites and potential economic payoff for Big Solar is in the sun-drenched West, companies like BrightSource have been targeting Congress members from western states. “We want both representatives and senators to see the benefit of this: price certainty, jobs, clean energy,” says Bar-Lev.

While the situation changes daily, action on the energy legislation is expected sometime in the next two weeks.

Read Full Post »

hp-enviro-1.pngOvershadowed by Google’s jump into the renewable energy business on Tuesday was Hewlett-Packard’s more modest move to go green by installing a 1-megawatt solar array at its San Diego facility, buying wind power for its Ireland operations and subsidizing employees’ home solar systems.

In Silicon Valley these days putting a whopping solar array up on your roof is akin to having the coolest corporate jet or your CEO back-ordered for a Tesla Roadster. Google (GOOG), of course, has the biggest, a 1.6-megawatt monster that covers buildings and carports at the Googleplex in Mountain View. Not to be outdone, Applied Materials (AMAT) is planning an even larger solar system for its headquarters in neighboring Santa Clara.

But there’s more at stake here than green bragging rights. Companies like HP (HPQ) are realizing that tapping renewable energy can also be good for the bottom line. Take HP’s solar array in San Diego, for instance. The 5,000-panel system carries no capital costs for HP as the array will be financed and operated by a third-party affiliated with solar cell maker SunPower (SPWR). The Silicon Valley company will install the array and perform maintenance for 15 years while HP purchases the electricity produced by the solar system at a guaranteed below-market rate. That gives the company a hedge against rising energy costs. (HP thinks it’ll save $750,000 over 15 years.) HP also retains ownership of any potentially marketable renewable energy credits associated with the array while the financier can take advantage of California’s solar subsidies.

SunPower wasn’t disclosing the identity of that financier when Green Wombat inquired on Tuesday, but this morning the company announced a $200 million deal with Morgan Stanley (MS) to provide financing for solar installations and power purchase agreements like the one HP signed. SunPower and Morgan Stanley have formed a jointly owned holding company to finance SunPower’s solar systems for customers, with the Wall Street firm kicking in up to $190 million and SunPower putting up as much as $10 million.

In Ireland, HP will buy a year’s worth of clean electricity generated by Airtricity’s European wind farms, saving the company an estimated $40,000 in 2008. Electricity generated by Airtricity’s wind farms is fed into Ireland’s national power grid rather than directly to HP facilities. But the additional power generated by the wind farms, as well as the solar electricity eventually produced by the San Diego array, will eliminate tons of greenhouse gas emissions from the atmosphere.

Last, SunPower will give HP employees a $2,000 rebate if they install the company’s residential solar systems, with HP providing another $2,000. That’s on top of state rebates under the California Solar Initiative program.

Read Full Post »

luz-power-plant.jpg

Google the jolly green giant?

In a move to shake up the nascent renewable energy industry, Google announced Tuesday it will spend hundreds of millions of dollars developing new solar and wind technologies while investing in green tech startups.

The goal, according to Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page: Send the fossil fuel industry to the coal bin of history by making renewable energy cheaper than coal, a main culprit in the global warming crisis.“

Assuming we can develop this, we want to deploy it as broadly as possible,” said Brin during a conference call. “Which means we’ll license the technology or put it in place ourselves.” Of particular interest is spreading renewable energy technology to rapidly industrializing but coal-dependent countries like China and India.

Dubbed RE<C (as in Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal), the Google initiative will involve hiring green energy engineers and technologists for an in-house R&D program that will focus on developing breakthroughs in large-scale solar power plants. At the same time, Google’s (GOOG) philanthropic arm, Google.org, will invest in green energy companies. Within a few years Google wants to be able to produce a gigawatt of clean energy — enough to power a city the size of San Francisco — at a price that will undercut cheap electricity from coal-fired plants.

For solar energy companies, the double-headed approach raises the prospect of both a potential brain-drain to Google and the possibility of a payday if the search giant goes on a green tech shopping spree. Page said Google routinely acquires “dozens of companies” and would apply that strategy to the renewable energy initiative where appropriate.

John O’Donnell, executive vice president of Silicon Valley solar energy startup Ausra, said he welcomes Google’s bid to become a green energy player.”I think folks who have or are developing technologies that can deliver RE<C are going to get some speedup in moving to market,” he told Green Wombat. “That’s good news for the sector and for the planet.”

Ausra, backed by venture capital heavyweights Vinod Khosla and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, builds large-scale solar power plants and recently signed a long-term deal with California utility PG&E (PG&E).

“We’re at a more mainstream engineer/build stage, and don’t expect hiring problems,” O’Donnell added. “Google may encourage more smart folks to seek careers in clean energy.”

Given that a solar power plant can cost anywhere between half a billion and a billion dollars or more, it appears Google will concentrate on perfecting solar technology rather than get into the utility business. “In terms of building power plants, hundreds of millions of dollars is really not a large sum, so I hope they spend the money in a highly leveraged way to get the most out of it,” says John Woolard, CEO of solar power plant startup BrightSource Energy, which is negotiating with utilities to supply 1.5 gigawatts of solar electricity.

“We are very active in the Southwest, and would look forward to working with a group like Google on building out power plants,” he adds. “I never would have predicted that Google would emerge as a provocative leader in large scale solar, but I am very excited about thevisibility it brings to an area of technology that we know has real economic potential.”

Google already is working with two renewable energy startups. One is eSolar, a Pasadena, Calif., developer of utility-scale solar thermal power plants whose chairman is serial tech entrepreneur Bill Gross. The other is Makani Power, a stealth Bay Area startup that is developing what it calls “high-altitude wind energy extraction technologies aimed at the most powerful wind resources.”Page and Brin declined to say if Google has invested in those companies.

PG&E spokeswoman Jennifer Zerwer said RE<C is “clearly a sign of the growing awareness of and response to climate change — and that is a positive trend, especially for those concerned about climate change, as we are. While we did not work directly with Google on this announcement, we team with them on their energy efficiency and renewable efforts.”

Like other California utilities, such as Southern California Edison (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE), PG&E is under the gun to obtain 20 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by 2010 and 33 percent by 2020.

The move into green energy is Google’s biggest departure so far from its core search and advertising business. But Page noted it is not a change of mission for Google.org, which currently is managing initiatives to promote plug-in hybrid cars.

Brin and Page took pains to stress that RE<C makes good business sense, with the potential to profit from Google’s stake in green energy companies or technology the company develops. Still, acknowledged Brin, “We’re not going for huge margins. We want to deploy this fast.”

“This has the ability to change the world,” he added.

Read Full Post »

first-solar-logo.gif

Solar panel maker First Solar’s Google-like stock price – shares soared 34 percent Thursday to close at $224.43 – is either a sign that green tech is getting bubbly or that investors genuinely see a huge potential market in renewable energy.

Probably a bit of both. The Phoenix-based company makes thin-film solar modules for use in solar power plants or in rooftop arrays for commercial buildings. While thin-film offers lower efficiency than traditional silicon-based solar modules, it can be produced cheaper, and First Solar (FSLR) has been rapidly ramping up production. The trigger for today’s investor love was First Solar’s third-quarter earnings report on Wednesday that showed revenue spiked 106 percent to $159 million from the previous quarter and up a whopping 290 percent from a year ago. First Solar — fun fact: it’s biggest shareholder is the estate of Wal-Mart (WMT) heir John T. Walton — also upped its 2007 revenue forecast to $480 million to $485 million from an earlier estimate of $400 million to $415 million. The stock fell back to $206.85 at the close of trading Friday.

Investors have been prepped by recent announcements from First Solar that the company would double its manufacturing capacity by the end of 2009 and that it had signed new deals with customers. Much of First Solar’s production goes to solar companies in Germany, where generous government subsidies have made the country a solar hotbed. First Solar also is benefiting from being one of the first new-generation thin-film solar companies to market. A host of thin-film startups like Nanosolar and HelioVolt – they also minimize the use of expensive silicon but utilize a different technology – have scored hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from venture capitalists but have yet to produce products.

Savvy investors also know that the U.S. market is poised to take off, particularly for utility-scale solar projects. Half the states have now imposed so-called renewable portfolio standards that require varying percentages of utilities’ electricity be obtained from greenhouse-gas free sources. In California, for instance, in addition to the state’s global warming law that will cap greenhouse gas emissions, portfolio standards oblige utilities like PG&E (PCG), Southern California Edision (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) get 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2010 and a third by 2020. They’re going to need a lot of solar power plants to meet that mandate.

That explains why other solar module makers have experienced a similar run-up in their stock. For instance, SunPower (SPWR), which makes solar panels used in residential and commercial arrays as well as in photovoltaic power plants, has seen its shares spike 81 percent over the past three months to close at $141.93 on Thursday. That’s a 322 percent premium over what the stock was trading a year ago.

Read Full Post »

First_solar_logo
Solar panel maker First Solars Google-like stock price shares
soared 34 percent today to close at $224.43 is either a sign that
green tech is getting bubbly or that investors genuinely see a huge
potential market in renewable energy.

Probably a bit of both. The Phoenix-based company makes thin-film
solar modules for use in solar power plants or in rooftop arrays for
commercial buildings. While thin-film offers lower efficiency than
traditional silicon-based solar modules, it can be produced cheaper,
and First Solar (FSLR) has been rapidly ramping up production. The
trigger for todays investor love was First Solars third-quarter
earnings report on Wednesday that showed revenue spiked 106 percent to
$159 million from the previous quarter and up a whopping 290 percent
from a year ago. First Solar fun fact: its biggest shareholder is
the estate of Wal-Mart (WMT) heir John T. Walton  also upped its 2007
revenue forecast to $480 million to $485 million from an earlier
estimate of $400 million to $415 million. The stock fell back to $206.85 at the close of trading Friday.

Investors were prepped for by recent announcements from First Solar
that the company would double its manufacturing capacity by the end of
2009 and that it had signed new deals with customer. Much of First
Solars production goes to solar companies in Germany, where generous
government subsidies have made the a country solar hotbed. First Solar
also is benefiting from being one of the first new-generation thin-film
solar companies to market. A host of thin-film startups like Nanosolar
and HelioVolt they also minimize the use of expensive silicon but use
a different technology have scored hundreds of millions of dollars in
funding from venture capitalists but have yet to produce products.

Savvy investors also know that the U.S. market is poised to take
off, particularly for utility-scale solar projects.  Half the states
now have imposed so-called renewable portfolio standards that require
varying percentages of utilities electricity be obtained from
greenhouse-gas free sources. In California, for instance, in addition
to the states global warming law that will cap greenhouse gas
emissions, portfolio standards oblige utilities like PG&E (PCG),
Southern California Edision (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric
(SRE) get 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2010 and
a third by 2020. Theyre going to need a lot of solar power plants to
meet that mandate.

That explains why other solar module makers have experienced a similar run-up in their stock. For instance, SunPower (SPWR), which makes solar panels used in residential and commercial arrays as well as in photovoltaic power plants, has seen its shares spike 81 percent over the past three months to close at $141.93 on Thursday. Thats a 322 percent premium over what the stock was trading a year ago.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

berkeley-city-council-solar-vote.png

The Berkeley, California, city council Tuesday night greenlighted a proposal to pay for the installation of solar panels and solar hot water systems for any homeowner or commercial building owner in a move to dramatically boost local use of renewable energy. Property owners would retain ownership of the solar systems, paying back the cost over 20 years through an assessment on their annual property tax bill.

“We’re off and rolling,” said Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates after the city council unanimously gave initial approval for the Sustainable Energy Financing District.

Cisco DeVries, Bates’ chief of staff who devised the municipal solar financing proposal, said the city hopes to start signing up homeowners by June 2008. But first it must hammer out the legal and financial details. The city will likely float a bond to obtain millions in bank financing to pay for homeowners’ solar arrays.

“The banks and others have been very interested in this,” said Bates. “The banks that Cisco and I have had conversations with have been very encouraging.”

City manager Phil Kamlarz said Berkeley should be able to obtain a lower interest rate than commercial home equity loans as the property tax assessment will act as a lien, putting banks first in line to collect in the event a property owner defaults.

“We’re looking at what’s the benchmark to make this thing work and right now its less than 7.5% so we’re going to try to make this less than 7.5%,” he told council members.

A property owner would choose a solar installer from a city-approved list. It appears to be a win-win situation solution to the high cost of going solar. The homeowner immediately begins saving money on electricity bills without incurring the $15,000 to $30,000 upfront cost of installing a solar system. They also usually get a boost in their property value from the solar array and the property tax that pays for the system is deductible on their federal income tax return. When the house is sold the solar array and the tax assessment remain with the property, passing to the new owner and thus further diluting the cost of the system.

Bates said other cities have approached him about replicating the Berkeley initiative. The city has won the backing of utility PG&E (PCG) and the solar industry has, not surprisingly, been enthusiastic about a program that promises to expand the market for solar panels made by companies like SunPower (SPWR) and Sharp as well give installers more work.

“This is going to create green collar jobs,” said Bates.

Berkeley’s left-wing politics often puts it on the fringe of the U.S. mainstream but when it comes to environmental policies, the Bay Area city has led the way. Berkeley, after all, was the first city to adopt curbside recycling decades ago, now common even in some of the reddest of red states.

“The power of this is really expanding it beyond Berkeley,” noted one council member.

Read Full Post »

Berkeley_city_council_solar_vote

The Berkeley, California, city council Tuesday night greenlighted a proposal
to pay for the installation of solar panels and solar hot water systems
for any homeowner or commercial building owner in a move to
dramatically boost local use of renewable energy. Property owners would
retain ownership of the solar systems, paying back the cost over 20
years through an assessment on their annual property tax bill.

Were off and rolling, said Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates after the
city council unanimously gave initial approval for the Sustainable
Energy Financing District.

Cisco DeVries, Bates chief of staff who devised the municipal solar
financing proposal, said the city hopes to start signing up homeowners
by June 2008. But first it must hammer out the legal and financial
details. The city will likely float a bond to obtain millions in bank
financing to pay for homeowners solar arrays.

The banks and others have been very interested in this, said
Bates. The banks that Cisco and I have had conversations with have
been very encouraging.

City manager Phil Kamlarz said Berkeley should be able to obtain a
lower interest rate than commercial home equity loans as the property
tax assessment will act as a lien, putting banks first in line to
collect in the event a property owner defaults.

Were looking at whats the benchmark to make this thing work and
right now its less than 7.5% so were going to try to make this less
than 7.5%, he told council members.

A property owner would choose a solar installer from a city-approved
list. It appears to be a win-win situation solution to the high cost of
going solar. The homeowner immediately begins saving money on
electricity bills without incurring the $15,000 to $30,000 upfront cost
of installing a solar system. They also usually get a boost in their
property value from the solar array and the property tax that pays for
the system is deductible on their federal income tax return. When the
house is sold the solar array and the tax assessment remain with the
property, passing to the new owner and thus further diluting the cost
of the system.

Bates said other cities have approached him about replicating the
Berkeley initiative. The city has won the backing of utility PG&E
(PCG) and the solar industry has, not surprisingly, been enthusiastic
about a program that promises to expand the market for solar panels
made by companies like SunPower (SPWR) and Sharp as well give
installers more work.

This is going to create green collar jobs, said Bates.

Berkeleys left-wing politics often puts it on the fringe of the
U.S. mainstream but when it comes to environmental policies, the Bay
Area city has led the way. Berkeley, after all, was the first city to
adopt curbside recycling decades ago, now common even in some of the
reddest of red states.

The power of this is really expanding it beyond Berkeley, noted one council member.

Read Full Post »

ausra-mirrors-tilted.jpg

PG&E this morning finally consummated a long-expected solar power deal with Silicon Valley startup Ausra, agreeing to buy 177 megawatts of green electricity generated by a solar thermal plant to be built by the company on California’s central coast. As Green Wombat reported Friday, Ausra — backed by marquee venture capitalists Vinod Khosla and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers — has filed a development and licensing application with the California Energy Commission for the project, called the Carrizo Solar Energy Farm.

With its latest power purchase agreement, PG&E (PCG) has committed to buying more than 1.2 gigawatts of greenhouse-gas free electricity from three large-scale solar power plants — enough to light nearly a million homes. Construction of the Ausra power plant is expected to begin in 2009 and go online the following year. Terms were not disclosed — they never are in power purchase deals — but Ausra revealed in its Energy Commission application that the agreement runs for 20 years. The company, which decamped to Silicon Valley from Sydney last year, claims that its Compact Fresnel Linear Reflector system — long flat mirrors that focus the sun’s rays on water-filled tubes to create steam that drives electricity-generating turbines — will produce power at costs competitive with natural gas-fired plants. A pilot power plant (Ausra photo above) is up and running in Australia. The Carrizo solar farm will be a boon for the San Luis Obispo County economy, employing 350 workers during construction and creating 100 permanent jobs, according to Ausra.

Carrizo will be the company’s first solar power station in the U.S., though in September Florida utility FPL (FPL) announced it would build 10-megawatt demonstration plant using Ausra’s technology as well as a 300-megawatt version if all goes as planned. Ausra executives have told Green Wombat they anticipate rolling out enough solar farms to produce at least a gigawatt of electricity over the next few years.

That might be taken as so much Silicon Valley hype, and only time will tell if the technology lives up to its promise, but regulatory and economic trends indicate that deals like the PG&E-Ausra agreement is just the beginning of a wave of Big Solar projects. California’s investor-owned utilities — PG&E, Southern California Edison (EIX) and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) — face a 2010 deadline to source 20 percent of their electricity from renewable sources, with the ante rising to 30 percent by 2020. Those utilities are actively negotiating gigawatts of solar power deals, sources tell Green Wombat. Meanwhile, California-based solar power companies like Ausra and BrightSource Energy, as well as a host of overseas competitors, are moving to license prospective projects, confident they’ll secure power purchase agreements with utilities as well as the financing to build their solar power plants. That Morgan Stanley (MS) has quietly invested in BrightSource — the company is negotiating a 500-megawatt agreement with PG&E — is but the latest sign that Wall Street is looking to profit from Big Solar.

Even California’s green governator weighed in on the PG&E-Ausra deal. “Today’s agreement between PG&E and Ausra highlights how clean energy will create jobs in California while delivering a reliable source of renewable energy,” said Arnold Schwarzenegger in a statement. “I’m pleased to see California companies rising to the challenge of AB 32, California’s historic initiative to reduce carbon emissions and combat climate change. Clearly, California continues to lead the nation in clean energy research, development and generation.”

Read Full Post »

Ausra_mirrors_tilted
PG&E this morning finally consummated a long-expected solar
power deal with Silicon Valley startup Ausra, agreeing to buy 177
megawatts of green electricity generated by a solar thermal plant to be
built by the company on California’s central coast. As Green Wombat
reported Friday, Ausra — backed by marquee venture capitalists Vinod
Khosla and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers — has filed a
development and licensing application with the California Energy
Commission for the project, called the Carrizo Solar Energy Farm.

With its latest power purchase agreement, PG&E (PCG) has
committed to buying more than 1.2 gigawatts of greenhouse-gas free
electricity from three large-scale solar power plants — enough to
light nearly a million homes. Construction of the Ausra power plant is
expected to begin in 2009 and go online the following year. Terms were
not disclosed — they never are in power purchase deals — but Ausra
revealed in its Energy Commission application that the agreement runs
for 20 years. The company, which decamped to Silicon Valley from Sydney
last year, claims that its Compact Fresnel Linear Reflector system —
long flat mirrors that focus the sun’s rays on water-filled tubes to
create steam that drives electricity-generating turbines — will
produce power at costs competitive with natural gas-fired plants. A
pilot power plant (Ausra photo above) is up and running in Australia.
The Carrizo solar farm will be a boon for the San Luis Obispo County
economy, employing 350 workers during construction and creating 100
permanent jobs, according to Ausra.

Carrizo will be the company’s first solar power station in the U.S.,
though in September Florida utility FPL (FPL) announced it would build
10-megawatt demonstration plant using Ausra’s technology as well as a
300-megawatt version if all goes as planned. Ausra executives have told
Green Wombat they anticipate rolling out enough solar farms to produce
at least a gigawatt of electricity over the next few years.

That might be taken as so much Silicon Valley hype, and only time
will tell if the technology lives up to its promise, but regulatory and
economic trends indicate that deals like the PG&E-Ausra agreement
is just the beginning of a wave of Big Solar projects. California’s
investor-owned utilities — PG&E, Southern California Edison (EIX)
and San Diego Gas & Electric (SRE) — face a 2010 deadline to
source 20 percent of their electricity from renewable sources, with the
ante rising to 30 percent by 2020. Those utilities are actively
negotiating gigawatts of solar power deals, sources tell Green Wombat.
Meanwhile, California-based solar power companies like Ausra and BrightSource Energy,
as well as a host of overseas competitors, are moving to license
prospective projects, confident they’ll secure power purchase
agreements with utilities as well as the financing to build their solar
power plants. That Morgan Stanley (MS) has quietly invested in
BrightSource — the company is negotiating a 500-megawatt agreement
with PG&E — is but the latest sign that Wall Street is looking to
profit from Big Solar.

Even California’s green governator weighed in on the PG&E-Ausra
deal. "Today’s agreement between PG&E and Ausra highlights how
clean energy will create jobs in California while delivering a reliable
source of renewable energy," said Arnold Schwarzenegger in a statement.
"I’m pleased to see California companies rising to the challenge of AB
32, California’s historic initiative to reduce carbon emissions and
combat climate change. Clearly, California continues to lead the nation
in clean energy research, development and generation."

Read Full Post »

ausra-carrizo.jpgSilicon Valley’s solar boom continues with Ausra, a Palo Alto startup backed by venture capitalist heavyweights Vinod Khosla and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, filing an application to build a 177-megawatt solar power plant on California’s Central Coast.

Ausra’s lodging of its 1,000+ page “application for certification” with the California Energy Commission last week is another sign the company, which relocated to Silicon Valley from Sydney last year, is about to sign a major deal with a California utility. Khosla has previously said Ausra is negotiating with PG&E (PCG). In its application, the company stated that the San Luis Obispo County project, called the Carrizo Energy Solar Farm, would begin providing greenhouse gas-free electricity to “a major California utility” by June 2010 under a 20-year power purchase agreement. If the Commission licenses the project – at least a year-long process – construction would begin in 2009. In September, Florida utility FPL (FPL) announced it would use Ausra’s technology for a planned 300-megawatt solar power plant.

While there’s no shortage of solar startups with big plans for Big Solar, only three companies have actually taken the expensive and time-consuming step of filing a construction application with the California Energy Commission. (On Wednesday, Oakland, Calif.-based solar company BrightSource Energy cleared a major regulatory hurdle when the Commission signed off on its application for a 400-megawatt Mojave Desert power plant and began the licensing process.)

The Carrizo solar thermal power plant will deploy 195 long rows of flat mirrors to focus the sun’ausra-carrizo-map.jpgs rays on tubes of water suspended over the arrays. The superheated water creates saturated steam that will drive two electricity-generating turbines, to be supplied by either GE (GE) or Siemens (SI). While the efficiency of Ausra’s compact linear fresnel reflector system is lower than competing technologies, company executives claim they will able to drive down the costing of producing solar electricity to make it competitive with natural gas. (For more on Ausra, see Green Wombat’s previous post.) Unlike most solar power plants in the works for California, Ausra has chosen not to locate its facility in the Mojave Desert, where solar sites are sun-drenched but are often on government land and far from transmission lines. Instead, the Carrizo project will be built on 640 acres of old ranch land on the Carrizo Plain, where Ausra will just need to construct a 850-foot transmission line to connect to the power grid.

“Ausra Inc.’s (Ausra) proved, proprietary technology significantly reduces the cost of a solar thermal power plant and is thus capable of significantly reducing global carbon emissions by generating low-carbon electricity on a commercial scale at competitive prices,” the company stated in its application.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started